OK - I know they won't be taking too many buses, but:
A little interweb theft for you to browse: It kinda spooks me out when I see it actually written out before my very eyes:
The Kings were the easy part for the Vancouver Canucks. This is what we're looking at from here on in:
Wed, Mar 12 @ Anaheim PPV
Thu, Mar 13 @ Phoenix
Sat, Mar 15 @ Dallas
Mon, Mar 17 Phoenix PPV
Thu, Mar 20 @ Edmonton
Fri, Mar 21 Minnesota
Tue, Mar 25 @ Calgary PPV
Wed, Mar 26 @ Colorado
Fri, Mar 28 @ Minnesota
Sun, Mar 30 Calgary
Tue, Apr 1 Colorado
Thu, Apr 3 Edmonton PPV
Sat, Apr 5 Calgary
=> The Canucks play back-to-back three times and both involve plane trips in between. They also play three times in four nights twice. Meanwhile, Colorado doesn't have a single back-to-backer and Minnesota has one. Seems fair.
=> Four games on pay-per-view. Fantastic. We appreciate the Canucks are in the money-making business but this doesn't exactly create a tonne of goodwill. In fact, the word "hostage" comes to mind. And that's the way it's gonna be until the production value surpasses that of professional wrestling at the Croatian Cultural Centre. Or, Kirk McLean paints his face like Sting. We'd pay for that.
=> Everyone knows by now that Vancouver's last nine games are against Northwest Division foes. That could actually be good considering the Canucks are 12-6-5 against the division. Only Detroit (15-2-3) and Colorado (14-7-1) have done better. Calgary is 11-8-4, Minnesota is 11-9-3 and Edmonton is 9-12-2. So basically we're on easy street. Smoke 'em if you got 'em.
=> All those away games could put a lot of pressure on the Canucks to win at home to close things out. As of today, if you asked the oddsmakers, Vancouver would be favoured against Phoenix and Edmonton on the road, and the Oilers' line would be tight. For the rest of the away games, the Canucks would be underdogs. In other words, try not to freak out if they lose tomorrow in Anaheim; they're meant to. The Ducks are good.
=> In a related story, Calgary fans have to be concerned that nine of the Flames' last 13 games are on the road, including four straight to end the season. Luckily for them, the Flames are 18-13-1 away. Last year, they finished 13-20-8 on the road.
=> The one Vancouver game that sticks out as particularly huge is March 21 at home to the Wild. If the Canucks lose there, they'll have to endure all sorts of abuse (both self-inflicted and not) for three days before embarking on a brutal three-gamer. It won't be easy, either. Vancouver will have played in Edmonton the night before, the Wild two nights ago in San Jose. Again, thanks, Mr. Schedule Maker.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I really hope the Canucks do not make the playoffs this year. I say this as a Canucks fan. The reason is, if they do, they'll have another year's worth of over-appreciation for an over-achieving team. This is not a good team we have here and the only way they'll learn they have to rebuild the front end is if they don't make it in. I fear that if they make the playoffs and even win a round (which is highly unlikely) they may actually try to resign the waste known as Naslund and Morrison. It hurts to say that about Naslund, but he is a waste of money, and I don't think he'll resign for only the $1.5 he's worth.
As for the Flames, even though I say this as a pseudo-Flames fan, I really think they have a chance to relive 2003 this year, but bring home the Cup.
Post a Comment